录音/制作/创作 吉他 扩声技术 视频技术 作品展示 生活 信息 更多... | 音频应用专卖店

一個數字vs模擬測試 - PT VS Amek Galileo, 來聽聽喜歡那個和分別究竟有多大

( 44 )
 
[收藏]
-  第 1 页  -

13670
#1 06-4-23 22:26

一個數字vs模擬測試 - PT VS Amek Galileo, 來聽聽喜歡那個和分別究竟有多大

有位朋友在 GEARSLUTS 放了兩文件的連接, 分別經 PT HD 和 Amek Galileo 處理。


My method was as follows -

one mix was done entirely within protools. The song files I used for this was the protools session Nine inch nails posted for "only" for their remix contest. There was a little level setting within protools but no signal processing whatsoever. The system was a protools HD system (therefore usiing a 48 bit summing buss).
一個是完全在 pt 裡做, 歌曲是 " nine inch nail s"放在網上的分軌文件 "ONLY"(相信有些朋友也下載過)。只有少量音量調節, 訊號並沒有處理, 用 PT 的 HD SYSTEM ,故此是 48BIT SUMMING BUSS 。

The other mix was done on an Amek Galileo. Each track (as much a possible) was assigned to its own output of a Digidesign 192 interface (23ch in total). Each channel was calibrated with a 1k sine wave to be identical in terms of gain structure. The stereo tracks were panned hard, the panned centraly tracks did not have the pan pot "in", and any mono tracks that were panned were done manualy, although I did spend a long time making sure they were in the right place in the image.
另一個在 Amek Galileo 處理, 每軌由Digidesign 192 分配 共23軌。每軌以 1K SINE WAVE 測定, 作為相同的增益結構。立體聲的以極左極右分到兩通道, 單聲道的以手動盡量令到位置正確。

The faders on the desk were set to 0, as confirmed by the supertrue automation system, not just by eye.
推子以Amek Galileo 的超級準確的自動化 設在 0 位置。

This was assigned to the mix buss and recorded back into protools through the 192 interface.
最後安排到總輸並經 Digidesign 192 在 PT 錄音。

This was as fair a test as I could manage.
這是在我能力控制下的較公平的設置。

下載連接:- (是sitx 檔案, 要以stuffix 解壓)
http://download.yousendit.com/60C8C1C528D7AD51

The audiofiles are 44.1k 24 bit .aif

答案還未公報的, 等揭曉時便馬上告訴大家。

Amek Galileo簡介
AMEK Galileo 40 Position Chassis: 24 GAL10 Mono In-Line Input Modules
(Rupert Neve PreAmp, Classic AMEK 4 Band Fully Parametric Eq w/Hi and Lo Pass Filters)
8 REM10 Mono Dual Input Modules (Discrete Mic Amp and 2 X 4 Band Eqs)
8 Stereo Input Effects Return Modules 16 Aux Busses (8 selectable per Module)
RG2 Cue Module providing 2 Stereo Cues which can be sourced from Auxes,
Control Room or Stereo Buss 24 Multitrack Busses Right Hand Patchbay MPS15 Linear Power Supplies on 8 Meter Umbilical 42 LED Meters 2 VU Meters Recall Virtual Dynamics-One Device Per Module Assignable to Monitor or Channel Path VFX (Visual FX) Control of Select Midi Outboard Gear via midi sysex SuperTrue V3.X Automation Including VCA Fader Automation of Monitor and Channel Path Faders, additionally the following switches are automated on the Galileo Module: Aux 7 & 8 Mute Aux 5 & 6 Mute Aux 3 & 4 Mute Aux 1 & 2 Mute EQ in/Out Channel Path Insert In/Out Mix Path Insert In/Out Tape/Buss Switch Channel Path Mute Mix Path Mute Solo
Dimensions are Length=97.24”, Depth=49”, Height=43.2” (to top of meterbridge

[ 本帖最后由 himhui 于 2006-4-24 02:13 编辑 ]

4632
#2 06-4-24 09:43
I LIKE TRACK 2

1186
#3 06-4-24 17:25
关注中。。。

不知道什么时候能出结果啊。。

428
#4 06-4-24 18:11
sitx有什么软件能在PC下识别并解压吗

13670
#5 06-4-24 18:13
pc 版的 suffit , 全方位有....

[ 本帖最后由 himhui 于 2006-4-24 18:14 编辑 ]

5173
#6 06-4-24 18:53
下载先,谢谢hui兄!

7177
#7 06-4-25 01:38
stuffix。。找不到下载地址啊!

90
#8 06-4-25 02:03
不知道什么时候能出结果啊。。

1745
#9 06-4-25 05:06
名字应改是StuffIt
或者Crazy Stuff也有

sit档案还在下呢..速度很慢

13670
#10 06-4-25 09:45
haha.....一樓的寫錯了....是 stuffit 才對.....

1745
#11 06-4-25 10:35
我选2
理由:2 的定位,清晰度好点 (但其中有一段所混调的参数应改是不一样的...前面不久的吉它...2的已经稍偏左了,而1是居中)

但是觉得1的动态要好点.地鼓自然点

人声的时候...2多了点丝丝声

现在再想,又难选了...

[ 本帖最后由 sakyo 于 2006-4-25 10:36 编辑 ]

#12 06-4-25 13:09
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

341
#13 06-4-25 14:39
开始选2. 现在我个人主观选1了

#14 06-4-25 15:20
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

13670
#15 06-4-25 19:43
原帖由 lei 于 2006-4-25 15:20 发表
就这个对比我选2,但如果是另外一种风格......
Amek Galileo簡介----HIMHUI哥再对这个介绍一下,毕竟是与PT HD作较量.


這裡有些介紹, 可以看看
http://www.dvmission.com/ns_deta ... =0030:&catid=30
http://www.ekosound.com/Galileo.htm

[ 本帖最后由 himhui 于 2006-4-25 19:47 编辑 ]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

搜索