LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Version[求证]
本帖最后由 出入三星2012 于 16-8-9 14:57 编辑
起因：比较喜欢1代的采样甚于2代，但是2代的界面比较好用，一直希望官方能把一代的界面升级一下，像Project Sam一样
今天用bing搜索了一把，竟然找到了下面这个版本：
[LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Version]
1.国外网友DIY自制版本
2.I代的采样，16bit，重新压缩打包，9个G
3.II代的patch，也就是说2代的界面[原文介绍“16bit samples were taken from previous LASS release, compressed, converted and resaved for use with 2.0 patches”]
英文介绍：
Audiobro - LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Versionaudioz
![]()
Audiobro LA Scoring Strings 2.0 - unofficial 16bit version | 9.34GBStarting from version 2.0, Audiobro stopped supplying 16bit samples and replaced them with 24bit only. In this instace, 24bit is a waste of space, since all samples are normalized and their noise level is far above -90dBFS.
So I made myself this 16bit version and hopefully not just for myself.
16bit samples were taken from previous LASS release, compressed, converted and resaved for use with 2.0 patches. That alone took 18 hours since Kontakt file management engine is not optimized for multicore processors![]()
This is 24bit sample:
![]()
And this is 16bit:
![]()
As you can see, no big difference. There's faint residue of ATH noise shaping at the end of the spectrum, but that is above 18kHz, so not a problem. Also it's just 10dB difference.
The advantages of 16bit in this case outweigh the extra 10dB at 20kHz:
- Lower RAM requirements
- Takes up less HDD space (9.5GB vs 15GB)
- More CPU efficient
Decide for yourself if you prefer 16bit or 24bit.![]()
网页链接[audioz官网?]
https://audioz.download/samples/ ... 16bit-version.html#
起因：比较喜欢1代的采样甚于2代，但是2代的界面比较好用，一直希望官方能把一代的界面升级一下，像Project Sam一样
今天用bing搜索了一把，竟然找到了下面这个版本：
[LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Version]
1.国外网友DIY自制版本
2.I代的采样，16bit，重新压缩打包，9个G
3.II代的patch，也就是说2代的界面[原文介绍“16bit samples were taken from previous LASS release, compressed, converted and resaved for use with 2.0 patches”]
英文介绍：
Audiobro - LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Versionaudioz
So I made myself this 16bit version and hopefully not just for myself.
16bit samples were taken from previous LASS release, compressed, converted and resaved for use with 2.0 patches. That alone took 18 hours since Kontakt file management engine is not optimized for multicore processors
This is 24bit sample:
And this is 16bit:
As you can see, no big difference. There's faint residue of ATH noise shaping at the end of the spectrum, but that is above 18kHz, so not a problem. Also it's just 10dB difference.
The advantages of 16bit in this case outweigh the extra 10dB at 20kHz:
- Lower RAM requirements
- Takes up less HDD space (9.5GB vs 15GB)
- More CPU efficient
Decide for yourself if you prefer 16bit or 24bit.
网页链接[audioz官网?]
https://audioz.download/samples/ ... 16bit-version.html#